Legislature(2007 - 2008)CAPITOL 17
03/21/2007 03:00 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB168 | |
HB28 | |
HB71 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 168 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 71 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 28 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 28-POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE 3:12:57 PM CHAIR OLSON announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 28, "An Act requiring retail suppliers of electricity to disclose sources of electricity to consumers." 3:13:10 PM REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN made a motion to adopt CSHB 28, Version 25-LS0189\E, Kane, 2/26/07, as the working document. There being no objection, Version E was before the committee. 3:13:30 PM BARBARA COTTING, Staff to Representative Ramras, Alaska State Legislature, sponsor, explained that Version E addresses several concerns brought up during the previous committee hearing. Version E removes Section 2, which Legislative Legal and Research Services found to be unnecessary, as this was covered in other sections of the bill. Additionally, Section 5 was removed, which allows utilities grossing less-than $50,000 per year to remain exempt from the reporting requirements. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER asked if the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA) holds a position on HB 168. 3:15:04 PM JAMES KEEN, Chief/Engineering, Regulatory Commission of Alaska (RCA), Department of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development (DCCED), replied that the RCA does not have a position, but is happy with the changes made by Version E. He stated that Section 5 of the original bill would have been difficult to enforce; however, the remainder of the bill can be implemented through regulations. REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN asked whether utility companies approached the sponsor to request this legislation. 3:15:58 PM REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS explained that he received his monthly statement from a rental unit he owns in California, which included a power disclosure form. He felt this would be of interest to Alaskans. He went on to say that in Fairbanks, consumers have the option of purchasing renewable energy at a higher rate per kilowatt. He opined that this is an inexpensive way for consumers to increase awareness of the energy source. He stated that he was not approached by any utilities. He pointed out that the only resistance was from Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA). The GVEA was under the impression that the disclosure would be monthly; however, since it is a yearly disclosure, this resistance has dissipated. In response to a question from Representative Gatto, he clarified that GVEA offers a program for consumers to choose alternative energy sources. The power disclosure statement is offered in California. Both of these programs resulted in the introduction of HB 168. 3:19:27 PM REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX inquired as to what the disclosure statement would cost the utilities. REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS replied that he receives many enclosures each year from GVEA. When questioned, GVEA stated that this would not be a high cost to the company. He opined that this would not be any different from the enclosures currently sent out. REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN noted that the bill does not specify how this information should be disclosed. He opined that most utilities are proud of the alternative energy programs offered. REPRESENTATIVE RAMRAS agreed. He pointed out that this information could be included in the utility's annual report, although many individuals do not read this. He opined that including this information in a monthly statement would encourage consumers to take a closer look. REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN opined that this would not be a significant cost to the utility, and therefore should not be an issue. REPRESENTATIVE GARDNER stated that this is an intriguing idea, and "potentially very powerful." She said that the lack of testimony from the utilities suggests that this is not an issue. She stated that this information may simply be printed on a bill, and thus may not require an additional piece of paper. She then stated that this is "pretty simple," adding that she is ready to support HB 28. 3:23:12 PM REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN moved to report CSHB 28, Version 25- LS0189\E, Kane, 2/26/07, out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal notes. There being no objection, CSHB 28(L&C) was reported from the House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee. The committee took an at-ease from 3:23 PM to 3:25 PM.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|